41 Comments

you say "This war is unjust and criminal on both sides." why both sides?

Expand full comment

I am guessing this would include

Repression of Russian language by Kyiv

Shelling of civilians in Donbass for a decade

A government almost as corrupt as Russia

Ukrainian war crimes such as execution of prisoners

Misuse of prisoners for propaganda

The neo Nazi units eg Azov Battalion

Not saying this is bad as what is alleged in the pro-Ukraine propaganda we get daily in Western media. But then our media are wilfully blind to any faults the Ukrainians might have.

Expand full comment

Samantha Power, the US ambassador to the UN, addressed Russia’s professed desire to protect the rights of Russian speakers in the Crimea.

There were so many options available to Russia to safeguard the rights of ethnic Russians short of military action, the very simple question today was why not support international efforts, why not support an observer mission.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/03/ukraine-crisis-russia-control-crimea-live?view=desktop#block-5314cd8ae4b0984a90a9e082

that's what a rules based order is all about - preventing war and invasions.

the problem, of course, is the fear of encroaching "liberal values" in the west.

War is never the answer to a moral question. The legalization of criminal behavior undermines any moral argument.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
April 14, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Seriously. The Russians just dropped Sarin gas on Mariupol. Are the Ukrainians supposed to just hold up peace signs and let them drop Sarin gas on Mariupol?

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
April 14, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

I suppose it's hard to say with so little information coming out of that blockaded city. Regardless, there's reports of rapes, summary executions, mass graves, cluster bombs, mines, deliberately targeting civilians. Bombing hospitals, attacking refugees as they try to escape dangerous areas near the front. All over Ukraine.

Russia is the clear aggressor and defenders have a right to fight back.

And frankly, the behavior of the Russian aggressors justify it. If the Russians didn't cross the border, there would be no war. If they went home, the war would stop. This is on them. Every casualty on both sides.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
April 14, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Right. The Russians are coming to the aid of the poor beleaguered people who shot down a commercial airline... 8 years after the Russians attacked Ukraine to seize the Crimean peninsula.

Honestly, you realize that this crap is just hilariously unconvincing right? At least Ukraine is an object lesson for nations like Finland and Sweden about the risks of sharing a border with Russia without being a member of NATO.

Expand full comment

Thanks for this, our world needs to hear from more Russians

Expand full comment

Communism failed and killed millions of people. What is the point of continuing this nonsense party ?

Expand full comment

I trace my heritage to 4 Ukrainian grandparents, 2 who spoke Russian and 2 who spoke Ukrainian. I find Putin's references to Ukraine (country, culture, church, language etc) as somehow illegitimate (or inferior to Russian) to be particularly obnoxious. as an embodiment of a Ukrainian co-existence of cultures that which Putin seeks to rend asunder, I am sickened beyond remedy. i am left to prayer

Expand full comment

Russia is not a failed capitalistic society girded by the rule of law. It's a hodge podge of nascent capitalistic society at the street level with an umbrella mobster structure called the oligarchs, what in America 129 years ago were called the Robber Barons. Think Chicago during the 1920s for the current corruption with no Elliot Ness fighting it. The remnant of the Russian heirarchy serves as it's sovereign entity.

The essay portends the neo-Communists will save Russia, but that's what the Mensheviks claimed they would do different from the czars, and the Bolsheviks said they would do different than the Mensheviks.

Yes, the American republic has its challenges with free market corruption, but 180 years I'd socialism has shown it always and quickly falls into a perpetual Dictatorship that never withers.

Expand full comment

Yes, war is always hell, regardless of the side you are fighting for. However to claim that "This war is unjust and criminal on both sides," you need to address the facts that (1) the war is occurring in Ukraine, not in Russia, (2) Russians have moved troops and equipment, bombs and missiles, and land mines INTO Ukraine, and THROUGHOUT Ukraine, (3) Ukrainians are defending Ukrainian cities, towns, and villages, (4) no one needs to defend Russian cities, towns, and villages, because no one is attacking them. If you wish to dispute these facts, I am all ears, but if you do not dispute them, please note that they belie your statement regarding "both sides."

Expand full comment

Hard to take any of this writing as anything but parody when the first paragraph reads - "This war is unjust and criminal on both sides."

Perhaps - now stay with me here for a sec.... if the Russian forces never stepped foot into Ukraine, provoked the violence in Eastern Ukraine, Russia would still be on its way towards Kleptocracy. It doesn't take Marxism to respect sovereign borders, only leaders who aren't complete villains.

But hey Substack has a place for demented communists all the same. Keep writing your garbage - never stop.

Expand full comment

Uhh, again! Lost in USSR dream leftist is trying to gaslight with anti-capitalist and pseudo-pacifistic rant while pedaling the same old narrative - you cannot live without Russia. Guess what, we can.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
April 14, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Nobody denies the riches of that land, but who will control them is an open question. I doubt it will be Russian government given the inevitable decentralization and balkanization after the Putin government collapse (in the long run, of course).

Expand full comment

The Communists murdered and enslaved millions of their own citizens and you want to bring that back? That sounds more evil that what Putin is doing right now. Putin was wrong to invade Ukraine. But using that as an excuse to bring back a corrupt, evil system doesn't seem to be a good solution.

Expand full comment

Russia didn't start this war, it was Ukraine that took up arms against Donbass, when the attack stalled, NATO came to their aid. Why is NATO involved in a regional conflict? I have been protesting Canada's participation for years, NATO turned this into a global crisis. They always claimed it was a war against Russia, but we saw what happened when Russia finally entered the conflict. No one would deal with Russia honestly, that's my view from Canada.

Expand full comment

I suspect you are right about that. Difficult to tell for sure with all of the propaganda right now. But from what I know so far it appears that this conflict could have been prevented with some pressure on Zelensky to make a deal before Putin ordered the attacks. There seems to be much more going on here than the Fake News Networks are telling us.

Expand full comment

NATO did not turn this into a global crisis. It would not have happened without the United States leading it.

Expand full comment

NATO is just the sales department for the American MIC, everything that NATO does is led by the US, but NATO countries are willing participants, ASPI is no different.

Expand full comment

Social media 101: Don't feed trolls!

Expand full comment

For the Communists: Free Market Capitalism is not the problem. However, Corrupt Corporate Capitalism IS a HUGE problem in America and in many Democratic countries. So that is some truth in the fact that Capitalism can create huge problems if not properly controlled. OTOH Communism also created problems and caused millions of innocent people to die in every country it has been tried. NO ideology is perfect. That's for sure. So why not try to take the best parts of both and create a system that works for the majority and also takes care of those at the bottom? Capitalism has the ability to create far more wealth than Communism or Socialism. But that also creates other issues. Like too much money, power and control in the hands of a few. To those familiar with Communism in practice this should sound very familiar. Because the exact same situation occurs in that system. The leaders say that they are going to help the poor. But those leaders usually live very well while the masses suffer. Communism is a scam. It preys on the ignorant, indoctrinated poor and they end up suffering the worst in the end.

Expand full comment

I believe the biggest point being missed is consent of the governed. Peeking at a 2015 map of gas and petroleum indicates the natural gas field takes a diagonal route from Russia through the NE part of Ukraine. And Ukraine had development offshore plans South of Crimea. I also believe oligarchs in Ukraine were adding pass through fees from Russian resources and that is the whyfor of the newer Nordstream pipeline through the Baltic. I could be wrong, Putin may want to "save" Russians in the Kaliningrad Oblast with a highway to Moscow. And Putin might want to annex the Russian enclaves in New York (Sheepshead bay? New Brighton Beach?). Will somebody ask him why he is wreaking such devastation? Kill a hundred to save one?

Expand full comment

I don't know if Russians ever heard of Scott Ritter but his recent piece in Monthly Review Online may be of interest. https://mronline.org/2022/04/14/the-ukrainian-conflict-is-a-u-s-nato-proxy-war-but-one-which-russia-is-poised-to-win-decisively-scott-ritter/

Expand full comment

As an American I've been engrossed in your 8-year conflict, ever since the 2014 Maidan coup of the legally elected Yanukovych government. Your short essay fails to mention the evil role played the Neocon-controlled US puppet masters. That coup would never have happened if it hadn't been funded (to the tune of 5 billion) by Russia-haters led by Victoria Nuland and John McCain and greenlit by Barack Obama. The CIA is behind every regime change operation that has a negative effect on Russia. Smaller European countries, including Germany, are irrelevant. They all kowtow to their US masters. When Washington tells them to jump, they ask how high.

Anyway, many analysts are now starting to question Mr. Putin's caution, and for waiting too long to stop the US drive to make Ukraine a belligerent NATO flunky on Russia's southern border. Why didn't Putin crush the coup in its infancy, (before Ukraine was supplied with so much high-tech weaponry), when he took back Crimea? Failing that, given that you claim that Russia is incapable of fighting a prolonged war (didn't Putin already know this?), he could have employed "shock and awe" tactics, as the US perfected in Iraq and Libya, to end the war in a matter of days, which would have resulted in few Russian casualties, and fewer Ukrainian ones in the long run? Wouldn't that have forced Zelenskyy to the negotiating table, forced to surrender on Russia's terms, and bringing this nightmare to a close? Much more to say, but I've droned on long enough. Best of luck to your country.

Expand full comment